#PrayForSabah: Finally, Guru Yang Hina Pasukan Keselamatan Tu Diburu @PDRMsia !!!

Polis memburu seorang guru yang bertanggungjawab menghina pasukan keselamatan sebagai ‘anjing’ dan menganggap kematian mereka sebagai ‘mati katak’ dalam laman sosial Facebook miliknya, baru-baru ini.

Ketua Polis Kelantan, Datuk Jalaluddin Abdul Rahman berkata, lelaki itu, Mohd. Lotfi Nor, 37, yang berasal dari Pasir Putih, dipercayai sedang bersembunyi.

Menurut beliau, pihaknya telah membuka kertas siasatan berhubung laporan polis yang dibuat sebelum ini mengikut Seksyen 41 Akta Hasutan 1948.

“Siasatan segera akan dijalankan kerana tindakan lelaki itu yang dipercayai mengajar di Sekolah Kebangsaan (SK) Tok Bali, Pasir Puteh di sini bukan sahaja melampau tetapi boleh meracuni fikiran orang ramai.

“Kita akan siapkan kertas siasatan dan hantar kepada Ketua Unit Pendakwaan untuk tindakan susulan.

“Kalau dia tidak waras tak kan dia pandai menulis mengeluarkan kata-kata sebegitu, pandai pula takut dan bersembunyi," katanya dalam sidang akhbar di sini hari ini. - UTUSAN

BIADAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#PrayForSabah: Mahkamah Jatuhkan Hukuman Terhadap Tian Chua...

Naib Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat dan Anggota Parlimen Batu Tian Chua dihadapkan ke Mahkamah Sesyen, Kuala Lumpur hari ini dengan empat pertuduhan berhubung isu Lahad Datu.

Empat pertuduhan itu berkaitan dengan empat kenyataan Tian Chua iaitu :

1. Serangan tembak-menembak di Lahad Datu dipercayai konspirasi terancang kerajaan Umno untuk mengalih perhatian dan menakut-nakutkan rakyat 

.2. Insiden berkenaan menimbulkan banyak persoalan dan keraguan di sebalik wayang mainan kerajaan Umno. 

3. Menyifatkan pencerobohan di Lahad Datu hanya sandiwara kerajaan untuk menakut-nakutkan rakyat seolah-olah wujud suasana tidak aman di Sabah. Kejadian pencerobohan di Lahad Datu hanya sandiwara kerajaan untuk menakut-nakutkan rakyat seolah-olah wujud suasana tidak aman di Sabah; dan 

4. Ada konspirasi oleh kerajaan Umno untuk mengalih pandangan rakyat Sabah, terutama dari isu pemberian kad pengenalan kepada warga asing.

Beliau didakwa melakukan kesalahan itu di No. 62-2-A Fraser Business Park, Jalan Metro Pudu off Jalan Yew, di sini pada pukul 11 pagi, 1 Mac lepas.

Pertuduhan dibuat mengikut Seksyen 4(1)(b) Akta Hasutan 1948 dan boleh dihukum menurut Seksyen 4(1) akta sama yang boleh didenda maksimum RM5,000 atau penjara maksimum tiga tahun atau kedua-duanya bagi kesalahan kali pertama dan boleh dipenjara maksimum lima tahun bagi kesalahan seterusnya. - BRO JINGGO

#AnwarSodomy2: (Part 1) Siapa Sebenarnya Yang Meliwat?

Berikut adalah salinan sirat daripada pemilik laman FMT iaitu RPK. Disini ada menceritakan tentang kisah sebenar kes liwat yang melibatkan seorang insan bernama Anwar Ibrahim.  

Disini juga saya sediakan TRANSLATOR untuk memudahkan anda memahami isi surat dibawah.

The real story of Anwar’s Sodomy 2 ( Part 1)

March 11, 2013 

FMT LETTER: From Yuktes Vijay, via e-mail 

I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR. I knew from Day 1 that the party was devoid of any integrity but for it to stoop to this extent is just mind boggling. I was working with one of Anwar’s long-time lawyers during the whole course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z of the trial itself.
When I say A-Z, it means from meeting the forensic and DNA experts to reviewing of the documents to finding case laws for his submissions. I was involved in everything. I do not wish to mention the name of the lawyer here as I revere him as my mentor and I do not wish to drag him into this frustration and anger pouring of mine. 

Why Anwar never took the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a fair trial. The truth is he was never brave enough to take the stand. He was never going to withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his now ally Datuk Yusof. If you Pakatanians have doubts, why not ask him these questions and get valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for it. 

• Why did Anwar personally and specifically request his Chief of Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents when there were other staff there;
• How come Saiful was aware of the code to enter the apartment which was ‘Mokhtar’, the name of Anwar’s security chief and brother-in-law? ;
• Video evidence that was sent to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi confirmed the presence of Saiful in the apartment, so how can Saiful’s presence in the apartment be refuted;
• Why was Saiful afforded special treatment i.e. he was given his own room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a new staff;
• Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed Anwar and told him about Saiful’s apparent afflictions to BN. Why was the call not heeded by Anwar?

Fearing that Anwar will not be able to withstand the onslaught by the Prosecution, the defence team then decided to ask him not to take stand uder the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar excelled in conning, deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela like persona. He is no Mandela, merely a good con artist. 

Fund for the overseas experts
The surprising factor here is why no one has ever questioned the fees that were involved in paying the forensic experts, Dr Brian Macdonald and Dr David Wells. Contrary to what the general public have been made to believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they were here, they stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number of days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come from? Did Anwar pay from his own pocket? No, he does not even pay his lawyers. So, he had very rich Datuks funding him. I do know the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons known close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions as to the wedding expenditure of the Prime Minister, why not question where the money to pay these experts came from? If a former convict and a mere Opposition Leader can have Datuks funding his legalexpences, what is wrong in having Datuks funding the wedding of the PM’s daughter? 

Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful. The only thing I can say is that the reason he was denied justice is that the Investigating Officer, Jude Perreira, ignored the protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and decided to do his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in his rectum. The only thing that stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the “break in the chain of evidence”. I will write a full piece on this soon. This drama itself deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there was evidence of Anwar’s semen in Saiful’s rectum. However, due to a break in chain of evidence and the question mark over the integrity of the samples, the evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of corroborating Saiful’s evidence. 

Conclusion for Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using Saiful’s dad to play up his victim role in order to garner votes. We all know for a fact that since he got acquitted he has lost that bit of “charm” about him as he has nothing to yell about anymore. I really hope he sues me so that I can prove in Court what I have just mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring you. I know your modus operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the public watch Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me) in action. And remember the e-mails, Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get me! 

The writer, a former Anwarista, worked in Anwar’s Sodomy 2 trial for the defence