KES LIWAT ANWAR 2: BERKAIT NATE TISA, APAKAH KESUDAHANNYA?

ISU HOT:

Rayuan kes liwat 2 Anwar Ibrahim yang dijadualkan pada 11 dan 12 Disember telah berlalu tanpa kehadirannya. Jelas sekali Anwar tidak mengambil berat soal keadilan walaupun melibatkan diri sendiri. Namun, yang paling teruk terjejas, tentulah mangsa dalam kes ini, iaitu Saiful Bukhari.

Keadilan yang tertangguh adalah ketidakadilan. Jelas, sistem kehakiman negara ini telah melakukan ketidakadilan terhadap pihak pendakwa atau mangsa.

Walaubagaimanapun, ia tidak bermakna kebenaran tidak pernah atau tidak akan terserlah. Malah, dalam kes liwat ini, kebenaran mungkin telah diserlahkan oleh Anwar Ibarhim sendiri dengan memilih untuk tidak hadir ke mahkamah atas alasan menghadiri Seminar anjuran International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) di Georgetown University, Washington.

IIIT mempunyai sejarah homoseksualnya sendiri di mana Pengerusinya, Ismail AlFaruqi telah dibunuh kerana terlibat dengan aktiviti homoseksual. Joseph Louis Young, iaitu seorang pelajar kulit hitam yang baru memeluk Islam telah mengaku membunuh AlFaruqi dan isterinya kerana memaksa pelajar melakukan hubungan homoseksual untuk mendapatkan biasiswa. Young percaya bahawa perbuatannya adalah tepat bagi memelihara kesucian Islam.

IIIT juga dikaitkan dengan CIA di mana ia dikatakan tempat untuk mengkaji pemikiran umat Islam untuk membantu pihak Neo-con memanipulasi dan melaga-lagakan umat Islam sesama sendiri demi mencapai cita-cita untuk menakluk dunia.

Apa yang menarik ialah Anwar mempunyai hubungan akrab dengan AlFaruqi dan IIIT. Sehingga kini, Anwar terus rapat dengan personaliti utama IIIT seperti Abd. Hamid Sulaiman, Dr. Ahmad Totonji dan Dr. Jamal Al-Din.

Justeru, tidak hairanlah Anwar memilih untuk menerima jemputan IIIT ke Georgetown University walaupun beliau sepatutnya hadir ke mahkamah pada hari yang sama.

IIIT mungkin masih menyembunyikan skandal homoseksual dalam organisasi itu, tetapi tidak bagi Georgetown University. Pada 17 Mac lalu, University itu telah melantik Presiden Homoseksual Pertama bagi Persatuan Pelajar iaitu Nate Tisa.

Anwar yang membentangkan kertaskerja dalam Seminar anjuran IIIT di Universiti itu dikatakan telah mengadakan pertemuan dengan Nate Tisa. Malah, khabar angin menyatakan bahawa Nate Tisa adalah agenda utama Anwar ke Washington dan Seminar adalah agenda Kedua.

Nampaknya keterujaan Anwar untuk bertemu dengan Nate Tisa membuatkan beliau sanggup mengenepikan keperluan untuk membela diri di mahkamah dalam kes Liwat 2.

Kesimpulannya, walaupun keadilan tidak semestinya tercapai, tetapi kebenaran adalah pasti dan tidak boleh diubahsuai. Dalam hal ini, keutamaan Anwar kepada Nate Tisa, Georgetown University dan juga IIIT dengan sendirinya memberitahu kita tentang kebenaran dalam kes Liwat 2.

AIDC:

APA RAHSIA DISEBALIK FOTO INI?

Foto Datuk Seri Anwar bersama pelajar Amerika Syarikat (AS) yang dikirim melalui twitter @anwaribrahim mula mencetuskan perlbagai spekulasi.

“Pelajar Universiti Georgetown, Natalia menghadiahkan topi universiti kepada uncle Anwar.Tq,” tulisan daripada twitter @anwaribrahim dipetik yang mengesahkan Ketua Umum PKR bersama dalam satu program dengan pelajar universiti tersebut.

Ketika Anwar mengadakan program di Amerika Syarikat (AS), pada tarikh sama beliau sepatutnya menghadiri kes pendengaran rayuan liwat II di Kuala Lumpur.

Ketidakhadiran Anwar itu, dibantah Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah kerana menurutnya sebagai responden, Anwar mesti hadir dalam setiap perbicaraan.

“Kami mengemukakan bantahan atas kegagalan pihak responden untuk hadir. Perkara ini tidak boleh diberikan toleransi,” kata Shafee.

Aktivis Kristian, Terence Netto, yang mungkin mengikuti Ketua Pembangkang itu ke AS, melaporkan salah satu program Anwar bersama IIIT (International Institute of Islamic Thought) di Washington, DC.

Dalam simposium anjuran IIIT itu, lapor Terence Netto, Anwar telah berhujah menggunakan pendapat pemikir liberalisme Barat John Locke dan Adam Smith untuk menangkis tanggapan popular di kalangan umat Islam bahawa pendidikan Barat adalah tidak mempunyai dimensi etika dan moral.

SETERUSNYA

USA TODAY:

Georgetown elects first gay Student Assoc. president

Nate Tisa became the first gay president of Georgetown University Student Association (GSA) on March 17.

Tisa, 20, is the third openly gay man to lead student government at a Catholic college. DePaul University elected the first, Anthony Alfano, 22, in 2011; Catholic University of America junior Ryan Fecteau, 20, was the second last year.

At greater rates than older generations, young Catholics have distanced themselves from the Vatican's anti-LGBT rights stance, Alfano said. But strict piety remains at the core of these Catholic schools, making some of Tisa's plans more difficult — particularly issues such as gender neutral housing, which will involve Georgetown donors and administrators, Tisa said.

"My Catholic faith helps me look at the good parts of the Catholic religion and push through the bad," Tisa said. "The dogma is right, but there's a tradition that's built up that's pretty bigoted."

SETERUSNYA

#AnwarSodomy2: [PART 2]: The Truth

It is indeed drama at its very best when a father who sits besides his son when the son swears in the name of God that he was indeed sodomised by the opposition leader, begs the Attorney General to appeal his son’s case when the AG Chambers were in the process of contemplation but somehow somewhat makes a 180 degree turn and accuses his son of making himself a pawn in a political game.

Throw in the name of the Prime Minister and confess that you have been a PKR supporter since 1998, you have a story that can make you millions albeit compromising your dignity, your own son’s integrity and give unwarranted political mileage to the opposition coalition.

I despise gutter politics, even if the person doing it was my idol, hence the reason I have decided to come up in the previous open letter with all the discrepancies that occurred during the course of Sodomy 2.

If all Anwar could conjure is that I was not his lawyer, in an official statement in the PKR website, it lends credibility to my side of the story as to the happenings in Sodomy 2 for the very reason that not even one of my allegations were answered with facts.

Of course, I got the usual bullshit of me being bought by Umno-BN but to be honest that is the least I bargained for knowing the PKR modus operandi of treating their de facto as “Anugerah Tuhan”.

As I had mentioned in my open letter previously, Anwar Ibrahim did not have the guts to take the stand and fight his case. This is the same man who went around the country in the run up to the judgment day on 9/1/2012 to explain his side of the story to the public but did not do it in open court.

Anwar decided to play the Mandela role to gain public empathy and overseas sympathy that he was not offered a fair trial. He ran away from answering questions and that is the truth.

Saiful Bukhari was asked questions in court by senior lawyers such as Karpal Singh and rest of the defence team. He had the guts and courage to withstand the questions that were thrown at him. Why Anwar failed to do the same? He claimed conspiracy from the word go but why so much hesitation and anxiety to take the stand if such an incident never occurred in the first place.

Carefully notice that Anwar hesitates and is afraid to make any statement under oath or in the name of Lord. Something which the guy Anwar claims to be a consummate liar, Saiful Bukhari, has done so. Since he is a tree man now, he loses the charm and popularity that came when he played victim of an alleged Umno-BN conspiracy.

The very court, which he had labeled as a “Kangaroo Court” and a BN tool, has acquitted him. How does he prove his point that BN is behind this saga again?

Saiful’s dad had no role whatsoever in the trial. He played the father who cared about his son until last week and now he claims conspiracy.


Why? The answer is simple. Anwar wants to hammer in the point that he is a victim of conspiracy. He is making Azlan his mouthpiece. Saying the things he wants to say through Azlan. Remember that Anwar is the King of deception.

Still skeptical over my explanations? Please ask “Anugerah Tuhan” to answer these questions:

1 Who prepared press statement Azlan read out in the press conference? If you are telling the truth, why pre-empt it? And I know for sure who wrote it Dato’ Seri.

2 Why join PKR and claim that he has been a PKR supporter since 1999 when till recently he has been anything but supportive of their “apparent” and “deceptive” cause?

3 What is the haste and need in having Azlan coming up with such statement and immediately roping him into PKR, that too without the presence of the party president? Does she even have a say in the party?

Anwar’s intentions are simple. He wants to put blame on the government or more precisely Umno-BN for the bisexual image that has been attached to him. For him, it is the case of proving that his assertion of conspiracy is true.

But the problem is, Anwar “allegedly” sodomised Saiful, not his dad.

My open letter previously has made many question my integrity. The problem is when wrong things are happening right in front of my eyes, you can’t just keep mum and move on, especially when you feel cheated that the very man you believed is a reformist and an honest man is not what he is. I am willing to take the flak as long as the rakyat know the real man behind the reformist mask.

Attack me all you can. I have put forward questions to Anwar in my previous letters. I have now too. I have documents to back all my claims, even this.

Astroboy no documents pertaining to your trial went without having a “check in” to my e-mail inbox. And this is not even part 2 of my article to your scam in Sodomy 2. Recall the alibi list? Recall the recorder that was passed to me by your brother, Rosdi to record all the conversations in the interview?

My demand is simple. Do not use Saiful’s dad for your political mileage ever again. Fight Saiful like a man.
Former Anwarista, a boy privy to all underground happenings in Sodomy 2

#AnwarSodomy2: (Part 1) Siapa Sebenarnya Yang Meliwat?

Berikut adalah salinan sirat daripada pemilik laman FMT iaitu RPK. Disini ada menceritakan tentang kisah sebenar kes liwat yang melibatkan seorang insan bernama Anwar Ibrahim.  

Disini juga saya sediakan TRANSLATOR untuk memudahkan anda memahami isi surat dibawah.

The real story of Anwar’s Sodomy 2 ( Part 1)

March 11, 2013 

FMT LETTER: From Yuktes Vijay, via e-mail 

I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR. I knew from Day 1 that the party was devoid of any integrity but for it to stoop to this extent is just mind boggling. I was working with one of Anwar’s long-time lawyers during the whole course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z of the trial itself.
When I say A-Z, it means from meeting the forensic and DNA experts to reviewing of the documents to finding case laws for his submissions. I was involved in everything. I do not wish to mention the name of the lawyer here as I revere him as my mentor and I do not wish to drag him into this frustration and anger pouring of mine. 

Why Anwar never took the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a fair trial. The truth is he was never brave enough to take the stand. He was never going to withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his now ally Datuk Yusof. If you Pakatanians have doubts, why not ask him these questions and get valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for it. 

• Why did Anwar personally and specifically request his Chief of Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents when there were other staff there;
• How come Saiful was aware of the code to enter the apartment which was ‘Mokhtar’, the name of Anwar’s security chief and brother-in-law? ;
• Video evidence that was sent to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi confirmed the presence of Saiful in the apartment, so how can Saiful’s presence in the apartment be refuted;
• Why was Saiful afforded special treatment i.e. he was given his own room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a new staff;
• Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed Anwar and told him about Saiful’s apparent afflictions to BN. Why was the call not heeded by Anwar?

Fearing that Anwar will not be able to withstand the onslaught by the Prosecution, the defence team then decided to ask him not to take stand uder the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar excelled in conning, deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela like persona. He is no Mandela, merely a good con artist. 

Fund for the overseas experts
The surprising factor here is why no one has ever questioned the fees that were involved in paying the forensic experts, Dr Brian Macdonald and Dr David Wells. Contrary to what the general public have been made to believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they were here, they stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number of days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come from? Did Anwar pay from his own pocket? No, he does not even pay his lawyers. So, he had very rich Datuks funding him. I do know the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons known close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions as to the wedding expenditure of the Prime Minister, why not question where the money to pay these experts came from? If a former convict and a mere Opposition Leader can have Datuks funding his legalexpences, what is wrong in having Datuks funding the wedding of the PM’s daughter? 

Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful. The only thing I can say is that the reason he was denied justice is that the Investigating Officer, Jude Perreira, ignored the protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and decided to do his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in his rectum. The only thing that stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the “break in the chain of evidence”. I will write a full piece on this soon. This drama itself deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there was evidence of Anwar’s semen in Saiful’s rectum. However, due to a break in chain of evidence and the question mark over the integrity of the samples, the evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of corroborating Saiful’s evidence. 

Conclusion for Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using Saiful’s dad to play up his victim role in order to garner votes. We all know for a fact that since he got acquitted he has lost that bit of “charm” about him as he has nothing to yell about anymore. I really hope he sues me so that I can prove in Court what I have just mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring you. I know your modus operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the public watch Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me) in action. And remember the e-mails, Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get me! 

The writer, a former Anwarista, worked in Anwar’s Sodomy 2 trial for the defence